Saturday, 11 April 2015

(3/2) PLTs: Identification and Analysis (10H Look HERE)


LEARNING INTENTION: To learn what PLT’s are, how to analyse them and be able to construct a full sentence that outlines that analysis.

Check your understanding:

I can construct a sentence that reflects my analysis of the PLTs of a particularly article

I understand what a PLT is

I understand how PLTs are intended to impact on a reader

I can explain why it is important to target specific readerships in my analysis

I can analyse how PLT’s are used to persuade the reader

I can communicate the analysis of PLT’s in full sentences


Learning Activity: Complete the crossword by matching the descriptions to the persuasive language techniques


Persuasive Language Techniques

}Pun: Clever work play

}Facts and statistics: Including evidence from credible research.

}Formal Tone: using correct grammar and language rather than casual or colloquial forms.

}Expert Opinion: Quoting from experts relevant to the topic

}Examples: Including clear examples of your point from real life.

}Rebuttal: Identifying a potential opposing argument and pointing out its flaws or weaknesses.

}Rule of three: Including a series of three ideas to create a mnemonic.

}Anecdotes: adding a personal story.

}Attacks and praise: Providing negative comments about an opponent.

}Rhetorical Question: Asking questions that don’t require an answer but engage the reader.

}Bias: Presenting a one sided argument

}Imagery: using words to create an image in the readers head

}Alliteration: Words play that involves the same letter or sound of words in a row

}Hyperbole: Making exaggerated claims.

}Generalization: making general comments and representations
Persuasive Language

}Descriptive language: language that creates a clear image in the readers mind

}Figurative language: Using metaphors and similes.

}Emotive language: Emotionally charged words

}Inclusive language: including the audience by using personal pronouns

}Colloquial language: Using language that places the author on the same level as an every day person.

}Jargon: Using subject specific language



Appeals

}Appeal to common sense: appealing to the readers common sense

}Logic: making an argument seem logical

}Appeal to nationalism: Making an appeal to the readers sense of national identity

}Appeal to hip-pocket: Appealing to the authors desire to ensure money is spent wisely.

}Appeal to family: Appealing to the readers desire to protect the family unit.

Write in your book any persuasive language techniques that you are unsure of. This list should assist you when it comes to writing the SAC and CAT.


Learning Activity: Read the article titled 'Choosing is hard, but it’s still a lifestyle choice' by Amanda Vanstone. You need to identify ITACT, 3 supporting arguments and at least 9 PLTs and PL employed by the author.

How to analyse PLTs

When analysing persuasive language techniques you need to focus on three skills.

1. Identify and describe the technique
2. Quote how it has been used
3. Describe the effect on the reader 

1 and 2. Nguyen uses a anecdote when she describes herself 'as the daughter' of asylum seekers.
3. By describing the 'state of horror' she 'fled' from she demonstrates she has an understanding of the issue. This could position families to have a greater respect of her opinion because she appears to speak for all asylum seekers.


Link to article http://mrmunners.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/choosing-is-hard-but-itsstill-lifestyle.html

Reflection: Score yourself out of ten on your understanding of todays lesson.

  • Could you find the crossword words?
  • Could you identify ITACT?
  • Could you identify arguments?
  • Could you identify PLTs?

(2/2) A Tale of Three Arguments: Identification

Identifying Arguments 101

When making an argument you provide reasons to support your POV. We do this everyday to ensure what we are discussing is backed up by support. In order for our idea to be persuasive it must have support and within a opinion article we call this a supporting argument




LA ESSAY STRUCTURE: The red text shows were the ideas in this blog fit into the LA SA structure.


 
Introduce understanding of article
Introduction:
 
Issue/Context, Text Details, Audience, Contention, Tone/Effect of tone
 
Analysis arguments within article
Body Paragraph 1:
 Analyse how the author uses persuasive language and techniques to argue their first supporting argument.
1) Identify the first supporting argument.
2) Identify and analyse how PLTs are used to persuade the reader.
3) Identify and analyse how PLTs are used to persuade the reader.

 
Body Paragraph 2:
Analyse how the author uses persuasive language and techniques to argue a second supporting argument.
 
Body Paragraph 3:
Analyse how the author uses persuasive language and techniques to argue a third supporting argument.
 
Conclusion:
How is the reader left feeling?
 
A Start Point:
It is important that we identify the contention. The supporting arguments are constructed to defend the POV the author is trying to make. Without a contention there can be no supporting argument.
Contention: The Australian government and society needs to do more to protect asylum seekers.





Now we have identified the foundation for the supporting arguments to back-up, we have also laid the foundation so we can demonstrate that we understand what the author is arguing.


The question we must ask ourselves is…


}  What supporting arguments does Nguyen employ to argue that Australian society needs to provide a sanctuary to asylum seekers

or

}  What reasons is Giselle Nguyen providing for Australia changing its asylum seeker laws to protect refugees.

or

}  Why does Giselle believe that asylum seekers should be protected by Australia?

In other words…
}  Giselle Nguyen thinks that the Australian government should provide asylum to refugees because…


Now we write our identified arguments in full sentences

Checklist for the identification of arguments

·         Is it a reason the author is providing for their POV?

·         Reference the author

·         Relate to the issue

·         Be a full sentence


Sample Identification of Arguments.



Original student idea is in italics, revised response demonstrating a full sentence is provided.

 

A1: The author argues that asylum seekers (They) are being persecuted and subjugated in their home country. 

Original response didn’t refer directly to the author (Nguyen). The response also began with the ambiguous ‘They’ employing the explicit ‘asylum seekers’ links the response directly to the issue. The response also need to address where ‘they’ where being ‘persecuted and subjugated’ thus the revised ‘asylum seekers are being persecuted and subjugated in their home country’ makes an implicit suggestion about why the Australian Government needs to address the issue. This makes a link back into the contention.

A2: Nguyen accuses the Australian Government of being racist with its asylum seeker policy. 

Original response did refer to the author and effectively identified an argument. However the response needed to make a reference to the asylum seeker policy to draw the focus of the argument statement through the issue and the contention.

A3: Nguyen makes the suggestion that asylum seekers have the potential to make valuable contributions to society and thus should be granted asylum.

The original response was poorly expressed, however an argument was identified. Response was re-written to include a reference to the author and the issue.

 

 
  


 
 

 

(1/2) Identifying and outlining an author's contention.